This is a full Next Generation NCLEX (NGN) unfolding case study: one client, six sequential items, one for each step of the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model. The client's condition changes between items, so read the new data at each step before answering — the correct response at 1000 may be wrong at 1600. Rationales explain each correct selection and the reasoning traps built into the distractors. Practice the individual formats too: all six NGN item types, or see how the NGN is scored.
Unfolding Case Study: Gallstone Acute Pancreatitis Complicated by Respiratory Failure
A 54-year-old woman presents to the emergency department at 1000 with 8 hours of severe, constant epigastric pain that began after a fried-food dinner and radiates straight through to her mid-back. She has vomited three times and cannot keep down liquids. She lies curled on her side with her knees drawn to her chest and states the pain is worse when she lies flat. History includes known cholelithiasis (ultrasound 1 year ago, surgery deferred), hypertension, and obesity (BMI 34). She denies alcohol use and takes lisinopril and a daily multivitamin. She is admitted with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, likely gallstone in origin.
Temperature: 38.2 C (100.8 F) oral
Heart rate: 118/min, regular
Respiratory rate: 24/min, shallow, splinted
Blood pressure: 104/62 mm Hg (baseline 138/84)
SpO2: 95% on room air
Pain: 9/10
Weight: 92 kg
Serum lipase: 1,480 U/L (ref 11-82)
Serum amylase: 620 U/L (ref 30-110)
WBC: 17,200/mm3 (ref 5,000-10,000)
Hematocrit: 47% (ref 36-48; client baseline 39%)
ALT: 210 U/L (ref 4-36)
AST: 185 U/L (ref 0-35)
Alkaline phosphatase: 320 U/L (ref 30-120)
Total bilirubin: 3.2 mg/dL (ref 0.1-1.0)
BUN: 24 mg/dL (ref 10-20)
Creatinine: 1.1 mg/dL (ref 0.5-1.1)
Glucose: 218 mg/dL (ref 70-110)
Calcium, total: 8.9 mg/dL (ref 8.6-10.2)
Triglycerides: 140 mg/dL (ref less than 150)
C-reactive protein: 118 mg/L (ref less than 10)
Admit to medical unit; NPO
Lactated Ringer's 10 mL/kg bolus, then 1.5 mL/kg/hr; reassess fluid status every 2 hours
Titrate fluids to urine output at least 0.5 mL/kg/hr
Hydromorphone 0.5 mg IV every 3 hours PRN severe pain
Ondansetron 4 mg IV every 6 hours PRN nausea
Right upper quadrant abdominal ultrasound now
CBC, CMP, lipase every 12 hours
Vital signs every 4 hours; strict intake and output; daily weight
Incentive spirometer every hour while awake
Nasogastric tube to low intermittent suction only if intractable vomiting
No prophylactic antibiotics
The six clinical judgment steps
It is 1000. The nurse reviews the client's vital signs and admission laboratory results. Select the findings that require immediate follow-up.
- Temperature 38.2 C (100.8 F)
- Heart rate 118/min
- Respiratory rate 24/min, shallow and splinted
- SpO2 95% on room air
- Serum lipase 1,480 U/L
- Serum triglycerides 140 mg/dL
- Hematocrit 47% (baseline 39%)
- Serum creatinine 1.1 mg/dL
Show answer & rationale
SpO2 of 95% on room air is within normal limits and is not itself an immediate concern, though it must be trended alongside the respiratory rate. Triglycerides of 140 mg/dL are normal; they are checked because levels above 1,000 mg/dL cause pancreatitis, so this value effectively rules that etiology out rather than raising a concern. Creatinine of 1.1 mg/dL sits at the upper limit of normal and, without a rising trend, does not yet demonstrate acute kidney injury — the BUN elevation is the more sensitive early volume marker here. Recognizing cues means separating findings that are abnormal and clinically meaningful from those that are simply present in the chart.
For each client finding, select the underlying process it best supports. Each finding supports one process.
| Intravascular volume depletion | Biliary obstruction | Systemic inflammatory response | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hematocrit 47% (baseline 39%) with BUN 24 mg/dL and creatinine 1.1 mg/dL | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Total bilirubin 3.2 mg/dL with scleral icterus | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Temperature 38.2 C with WBC 17,200/mm3 | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Alkaline phosphatase 320 U/L with ALT 210 U/L | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Heart rate 118/min, BP 104/62 mm Hg (baseline 138/84), urine output 20 mL/hr | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| C-reactive protein 118 mg/L | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
Show answer & rationale
Hyperbilirubinemia with scleral icterus, an elevated alkaline phosphatase, and an ALT of 210 U/L point to a stone obstructing the common bile duct, the etiology of this pancreatitis. An ALT above roughly 150 U/L early in the attack is one of the most useful biochemical clues to gallstone origin. This cluster drives ERCP and index-admission cholecystectomy decisions, not the fluid plan.
Fever with leukocytosis and elevated CRP reflects the typically sterile, cytokine-mediated inflammatory response of pancreatic autodigestion. CRP peaks at 48 to 72 hours; values above roughly 150 mg/L correlate with necrosis, so it is trended rather than acted on once. Because this client also has obstructive jaundice, ascending cholangitis must be actively excluded — fever plus jaundice plus right upper quadrant pain is Charcot's triad, and if cholangitis is present, antibiotics and urgent ERCP within 24 hours ARE indicated. Absent that documented infection, current US guidance (ACG) is explicit that prophylactic antibiotics are not indicated in acute pancreatitis, including necrotizing disease. The common error is either reflexively treating early SIRS as infection, or dismissing fever in a jaundiced client before cholangitis has been ruled out.
Complete the sentence by choosing from the lists below.
The nurse determines the client is most likely developing [1], as evidenced by [2].
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome
- Cardiogenic pulmonary edema from fluid resuscitation
- Aspiration pneumonia
- Atelectasis
- A PaO2/FiO2 ratio of approximately 155 with bilateral infiltrates and no evidence of cardiac failure
- An elevated serum lipase with epigastric pain radiating to the back
- A low-grade fever with leukocytosis and an elevated C-reactive protein
- Hypoactive bowel sounds with abdominal distention and guarding
Show answer & rationale
Cardiogenic pulmonary edema is the distractor that punishes surface reasoning: the client did receive fluid, and crackles are present. But flat jugular veins, no S3, no edema, a normal cardiac silhouette, and ongoing oliguria with hypotension all indicate she remains intravascularly depleted. Diuresing her here would worsen perfusion and kidney injury. Aspiration pneumonia is plausible after repeated vomiting but typically produces focal, often right-sided infiltrates rather than diffuse bilateral opacities in this time frame. Atelectasis does not produce a P/F ratio of 155 or diffuse bilateral infiltrates.
The incorrect evidence choices are all true statements about this client, which is exactly the trap. Lipase, fever, and abdominal findings support the diagnosis of pancreatitis; only the oxygenation and imaging data support the specific hypothesis of ARDS.
The client is being transferred to the intensive care unit. Select all the interventions the nurse should anticipate for the next 12 hours.
- Titrate oxygen to maintain SpO2 92% to 96% and prepare for possible noninvasive ventilation or intubation
- Continue goal-directed lactated Ringer's titrated to urine output of at least 0.5 mL/kg/hr with reassessment every 2 hours
- Elevate the head of the bed to 30 degrees and provide scheduled analgesia so the client can breathe deeply
- Administer furosemide 40 mg IV for the bilateral infiltrates
- Begin continuous pulse oximetry, cardiac monitoring, and serial arterial blood gases
- Initiate prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics because of the fever and leukocytosis
- Plan for early enteral nutrition within 24 to 48 hours rather than prolonged NPO status
Show answer & rationale
Continuous monitoring with serial ABGs is how the nurse detects the transition from compensated hyperventilation to respiratory failure before it becomes an emergency. Early enteral nutrition, begun within 24 to 48 hours once hemodynamics allow, preserves gut mucosal integrity and reduces infectious complications compared with prolonged bowel rest or parenteral nutrition.
Furosemide is wrong: the infiltrates reflect inflammatory capillary leak, not volume overload, and diuresis in a hypotensive, oliguric client accelerates acute kidney injury. Prophylactic antibiotics are wrong: fever, leukocytosis, and elevated CRP in the first 72 hours reflect sterile inflammation, and prophylaxis has not been shown to reduce mortality or infected necrosis while it does select for resistant organisms and fungal superinfection. Antibiotics wait for documented or strongly suspected infection.
The client is now in the intensive care unit. For each nursing action, indicate whether it is indicated or not indicated at this time.
| Indicated | Not indicated | |
|---|---|---|
| Administer IV calcium gluconate as ordered for symptomatic hypocalcemia | ◯ | ◯ |
| Replace magnesium as ordered before or along with the potassium replacement | ◯ | ◯ |
| Maintain continuous cardiac monitoring and assess for QT prolongation and dysrhythmias | ◯ | ◯ |
| Contact the provider about uncontrolled pain and request a scheduled analgesia regimen | ◯ | ◯ |
| Withhold opioid analgesia so that worsening abdominal findings are not masked | ◯ | ◯ |
| Insert a nasogastric tube to low intermittent suction as routine care for acute pancreatitis | ◯ | ◯ |
Show answer & rationale
Magnesium must be corrected for the other electrolytes to correct. Hypomagnesemia both causes refractory hypocalcemia — it impairs parathyroid hormone release and end-organ response — and drives renal potassium wasting, so replacing potassium at 3.2 mEq/L without addressing a magnesium of 1.4 mg/dL will fail. Continuous cardiac monitoring is indicated because hypocalcemia prolongs the QT interval, and hypokalemia with hypomagnesemia predisposes to torsades de pointes.
Pain at 7/10 on PRN dosing represents a failed analgesic plan; scheduled or patient-controlled analgesia should be requested, since uncontrolled pain perpetuates splinting, atelectasis, and catecholamine-driven tachycardia.
Withholding opioids to avoid masking the abdomen is outdated reasoning. Diagnosis here rests on imaging and laboratory trends, and analgesia does not obscure the deterioration that matters. Routine nasogastric suction is likewise obsolete: it is reserved for intractable vomiting or ileus and offers no benefit, only added discomfort, for clients without those problems. This client is not vomiting.
For each finding on hospital day 4, indicate whether the client's status has improved, is unchanged, or has worsened.
| Improved | Unchanged | Worsened | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpO2 96% on 2 L nasal cannula (previously 88% on room air, then requiring high-flow nasal cannula) | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Urine output 0.8 mL/kg/hr (previously 0.15 mL/kg/hr) | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Ionized calcium 1.14 mmol/L (previously 0.98 mmol/L) | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Temperature 38.4 C with WBC 21,000/mm3 after 36 hours afebrile | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Abdominal pain 8/10 with new palpable epigastric fullness and increasing distention | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
| Blood glucose 190 mg/dL on insulin infusion | ◯ | ◯ | ◯ |
Show answer & rationale
Oxygenation has improved: her SpO2 fell to 88% on room air at hour 6 (P/F ratio approximately 155 on 4 L nasal cannula) and she then required high-flow nasal cannula, and she is now 96% on 2 L with a respiratory rate of 20 — the acute lung injury is resolving. Urine output has improved from 0.15 mL/kg/hr to 0.8 mL/kg/hr, exceeding the 0.5 mL/kg/hr resuscitation target; with an improved blood pressure and a heart rate down from 126, this reflects successful volume restoration. Ionized calcium has risen from 0.98 to 1.14 mmol/L, at or near the lower limit of normal (reference ranges are lab-dependent, roughly 1.12-1.30 mmol/L), and potassium and magnesium are now normal — the electrolyte plan is working. The keyed direction depends on the trend, not on which lab's cutoff is used.
Two findings have worsened and belong together. A new fever after 36 afebrile hours with WBC climbing from 14,000 to 21,000 warrants evaluation for secondary infection — line, urinary, pulmonary, or biliary sources, and, though uncommon this early, infected necrosis, which typically develops after the second week. New palpable epigastric fullness with escalating pain and distention suggests an evolving acute peripancreatic fluid collection or acute necrotic collection (per the revised Atlanta classification, pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis require more than 4 weeks to mature). This is exactly why contrast-enhanced CT is pending.
Glucose of 190 mg/dL is unchanged from 24 hours ago. It remains abnormal and needs continued insulin titration, but there is no movement in either direction. Students often mark any abnormal value "worsened"; evaluation asks for direction of change, not simple normality.
Want more practice questions? Create a free NCLEX Key account — NCLEX-style questions with a full rationale on every answer. No credit card.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an NGN unfolding case study, and how is it different from a stand-alone item?
An unfolding case study presents a single client whose condition changes over time, followed by six questions in a fixed order — one for each step of the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model: Recognize Cues, Analyze Cues, Prioritize Hypotheses, Generate Solutions, Take Actions, and Evaluate Outcomes. New information appears between items, so the client you are answering about in item 5 is not the client you assessed in item 1. Stand-alone NGN items give you one scenario and one question with no follow-up. On the NCLEX, every candidate receives three case studies of six items each in the operational portion of the exam.
How are NGN case study items scored?
Case study items use partial-credit scoring rather than all-or-nothing. Matrix items are typically scored per row, so getting four of six rows correct still earns four points. Highlight and multiple-response items commonly use plus/minus scoring, where correct selections earn a point and incorrect selections subtract one, with the item floored at zero — which is why selecting extra options 'just in case' is costly. Standard drop-down cloze items award a point per blank, but paired items such as ‘the client is developing [1], as evidenced by [2]’ use rationale scoring: the pair earns credit only when both parts are correct. Outside those paired items, a partially correct answer can still earn credit, so never leave a row or blank unanswered.
Do I have to answer the six items in order, and can I go back?
Yes, they are presented in order, and no, you cannot return to a previous item. Each item is submitted before the next appears. This mirrors real clinical practice: the client’s condition changes between items, and NCSBN states that each item is scored independently and that care is taken to avoid cuing, so a miss on one item does not doom the next. Answer each item using only the data available at that point in the case, and resist the urge to answer based on what you suspect is coming.
What is the most common reason students miss case study items?
Answering the disease instead of the client. Students recognize the diagnosis in item 1 and then answer the remaining five from memorized textbook management rather than from the new data supplied at each step. In this case, the client with pancreatitis who receives fluid and then develops crackles is not in fluid overload — flat neck veins, oliguria, and a normal cardiac silhouette say otherwise — but the memorized association pulls students toward furosemide. Read the new data block first, every time, and ask what changed since the last item.
Sources
- NCSBN 2026 NCLEX-RN Test Plan — 18 case study items (three six-item case studies), each mapped to the six NCJMM steps
- NCSBN Help Center: Are items in case studies dependent on the correct response to a prior item? — Case study items are scored independently, no going back, and cuing is avoided
- NCSBN Help Center: What are the current scoring models? — Matrix MC scored per row, drop-down cloze per blank, SATA +/-, rationale pairs
- American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis (Am J Gastroenterol) — LR over saline, moderate fluids, no prophylactic antibiotics, ERCP within 24 h with cholangitis
- NEJM: Aggressive or Moderate Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis (WATERFALL) — Moderate LR (10 mL/kg bolus, 1.5 mL/kg/hr) avoids fluid overload of aggressive regimen
- Gut: Classification of acute pancreatitis 2012, revision of the Atlanta classification — Local complications: fluid collections, necrosis, pseudocyst, walled-off necrosis
Sources checked September 2026.